Google Message Continuity, announced today, allows companies to protect their email by backing up their Exchange servers to Google’s cloud. Read more
Posts Tagged ‘cloud’

Internet Redundancy with BGP
BGP with Multiple Internet Providers
Maximizing uptime requires multiple Internet carriers. The Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) allows companies to use two or more Internet connections at the same time and maintain connectivity during an outage without having to change IP addresses.
BGP has many options, but here are the basics for using BGP with multiple Internet providers.
Three Types of Routes
BGP tells your router where to send outbound traffic. When you connect your network to an Internet provider’s network using BGP, your router can receive three different routes: Default Route, Full Routes, or Partial Routes.
1. Default Route: failover but no optimization
Configuring BGP for each Internet connection using a default route allows a company to have automatic failover between two providers should one provider go down. However, BGP will not load-balance and will send all outgoing traffic to only one ISP. Default routes are often used on routers with less than 512 MB RAM.
2. Full Routes: failover plus optimization
Using full BGP routes with multiple Internet providers allows a company to:
- Optimize: Automatically optimize outbound traffic to choose the provider with the shortest path (shortest AS number, by default) to each destination.
- Failover: Have auto-failover should one of the ISPs go down. BGP tries to find the shortest path from your gateway to a destination IP address. If one of the carriers is down, the router simply chooses a path from the other carrier.
However, Full Routes typically require a router with minimum 1 GB RAM. Advertising full routes requires keeping all the Internet’s available paths in your router’s memory. As of 2010, there are over 280,000 routes on the Internet, so having two ISPs means you’ll need to store over 560,000 paths. A router with 1 GB memory typically starts around $25,000, depending on the vendor.
3. Partial Routes: optimizing a subset of designated paths
What if your router does not have 1 GB memory? You do not have to store all the paths. With Partial Routes, you configure the router to receive only certain routes. You could ask the ISP to only send some routes, but filtering routes yourself allows for more control and the ability to receive full routes if you upgrade your router.
Typically, you would designate a default route for each provider, plus some specific routes through each provider to frequently-accessed IP addresses (web apps, frequently-used web sites and services, off-site servers, etc).
Getting Started with BGP
Regardless of whether you choose default, full, or partial routes, you will need the following:
- Advertisement Authorization from Both Carriers: BGP only routes outgoing traffic. To failover incoming traffic, you need permission from both carriers to advertise the other’s routes.
- AS Number: if you have multiple Internet providers, you need an Autonomous System Number (AS Number, $500 from ARIN). As long as you can show you are using multiple Internet carriers, you qualify for an AS number, no matter what size your organization.
- /24 Subnet: Most ISPs require that you have at least a /24 set of IP addresses for them to advertise your subnet. You can buy one from your ISP, or you can buy one directly from ARIN.
Download as PDF: Internet Redundancy with BGP

Google’s Apps for Gov adds Security
Google says that this is the first multi-tenant cloud application suite that has received FISMA certification at a FISMA-Moderate level, which gives it the ability to store and serve sensitive (but not classified) information. Google’s Matthew Glotzbach says this encompasses 80-90% of all government information.
Read more: Google Launches Apps for Government, with Servers on US Soil

Google Talks about Business in the Cloud
Google posted a great article on cloud computing on their Enterprise Blog, including discussion of the advantages of using cloud computing and some information on the design of their data centers.
Key Quotes:
There’s quite a bit of talk these days about corporations building a “private cloud” with concepts like virtualization, and there can be significant benefits to this approach. But those advantages are amplified greatly when customers use applications in the scalable datacenters provided by companies like Google, Amazon, Salesforce.com and soon, Microsoft.
How much do you spend on maintenance?
According to Gartner, a typical IT department spends 80% of their budget keeping the lights on, and this hampers their ability to drive change and growth in their business. The reality is that most businesses don’t gain a competitive advantage from maintaining their own data centers. We take on that burden and make it our core business so that our customers don’t have to.
The opposite of virtualization:
In the virtualization approach of private data centers, a company takes a server and subdivides it into many servers to increase efficiency. We do the opposite by taking a large set of low cost commodity systems and tying them together into one large supercomputer. We strip down our servers to the bare essentials, so that we’re not paying for components that we don’t need. For example, we produce servers without video graphics chips that aren’t needed in this environment.
Still running an Exchange server?
There is limited value to running an Exchange Server in a virtual machine in the cloud. That server was never designed for the cloud, so you don’t get additional scale. You’d also need to continue to maintain and monitor the mail server yourself, so the labor savings are marginal. But with cloud-based applications like Gmail, we take care of all of the hassle for you. We keep the application up and running, and have designed it to scale easily. All of this provides an application that is roughly less than 1/3 the cost of a privately hosted mail system, has 100x the typical storage, and innovates much faster.

Forrester: Gmail One-Third the Cost of Self-Hosted E-mail
In their new report “Should Your E-mail Live In The Cloud? A Comparative Cost Analysis,” Forrester research does a cost analysis of self-hosted and off-site, cloud-based email services. The result?
“The overall conclusion is that any company with an employee count of under 15,000 would probably benefit from using off-site services.”
– Ars Technica
The two cloud-based services, Microsoft Exchange Online and Google Apps, were significantly less than all the self-hosted systems with Google Apps far and away the winner. In fact,Google Apps was significantly less costly than self-hosting for all size companies.
How much does your company spend on email? The report found that IT workers are largely unaware of the costs of running their own email systems. Many of those surveyed gave guesses from $2 to $11 per user, although a detailed accounting showed that the costs were often several times that (Forrester came up with $25.18 per month, compared with $8.47 for Google Apps).



